Skip to main content

Table 1 Prediction of HPV status based on radiomics features of HNSCC tumors

From: Applications of radiomics in precision diagnosis, prognostication and treatment planning of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Authors, year

Sample size, cancer type

Ground truth

Imaging modality

ML classifier

Metric: maximum performance a

Bogowicz et al. 2017 [50]

Train: 93, HNSCC

Test: 56, HNSCC

p16

Contrast CT

Logistic regression

Test-AUC: 0.78

Buch et al. 2015 [48]

Total: 40, OPSCC

Not reported

Contrast CT

n/a b

n/a b

Fujita et al. 2016 [49]

Total: 46: non-OPSCC

Not reported

Contrast CT

n/a b

n/a b

Huang et al. 2019 [51]

Train: 113, HNSCC

Test: 53, HNSCC

Train: HPV RNA c

Test: p16

Contrast CT

LASSO-regularized logistic regression

Nested CV-AUC: 0.73

Test-AUC: 0.76

Leijenaar et al. 2018 [52]

Train: 628, OPSCC

Test:150, OPSCC

p16

Contrast CT

LASSO-regularized logistic regression

Test-AUC: 0.70–0.80 d

Mungai et al. 2019 [53]

Total: 50, OPSCC

Not reported

Contrast CT

Logistic regression

n/a e

Parmar et al. 2015 [54]

Train: 136, OPSCC and LSCC

Test:95, OPSCC

Not reported

Contrast CT

Logistic regression

Test-AUC: 0.60

Ranjbar et al. 2018 [55]

Total: 107, OPSCC

HPV DNA-ISH

Contrast CT

Diagonal quadratic discriminant analysis

LOOCV-AUC: 0.80

Yu et al.

2017 [56]

Train: 150, OPSCC

Test:165, OPSCC

p16

Contrast CT

Logistic regression

CV-AUC: 0.75

test-AUC 1 f: 0.87

test-AUC 2 f: 0.92

Zhu et al.

2018 [57]

Total: 126, HNSCC

Not reported

Contrast CT

Random forest

CV-AUC: 0.71

  1. a The reported performance pertains to pure imaging feature-based HPV classification (i.e. models with clinical features were not considered)
  2. b A t-test was used to evaluate differences in texture parameters between HPV-positive and HPV-negative cases
  3. c The VirusSeq-software was used to detect strain-specific HPV RNA sequences in whole-transcriptome sequencing data [51, 58]
  4. d This study evaluated the impact of CT artifacts on the HPV classification performance. A test set AUC performance of 0.8 was achieved after exclusion of all artifact-affected cases from both the training- and test set. The test AUC ranged between 0.70 and 0.80 for all evaluated dataset combinations, including those with artifacts, and was not significantly different for all tested models
  5. e The logistic regression model was trained and tested on the same dataset without feature selection or cross validation, which is prone to overfitting, and overestimation of classification accuracy
  6. f Study reports results of winning submission of radiomics competition, wherein 165 test cases were split into two test sets
  7. AUC Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, CV Cross validation (of total set or training dataset), DNA-ISH DNA in situ hybridization, HNSCC Head and neck SCC, LOOCV Leave one out cross validation of total set, LSCC Laryngeal SCC, OPSCC Oropharyngeal SCC, Test Independent test dataset, Total Only one dataset used, Train Training dataset