From: An update on angiogenesis targeting in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
AGENTS COMBINED WITH BEVACIZUMAB | STUDY DESIGN/PHASE | #of PATIENTS | PRIMARY EFFICACY ENDPOINT | AUTHOR |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chemotherapy | ||||
 Pemetrexed + bevacizumab | Single arm, Phase II | n = 47 | Median TTP 5 months | Argiris, 2011 [25] |
 Chemotherapy +/− bevacizumab (chemotherapy was investigator’s choice: cisplatin+ 5-FU, cisplatin+docetaxel, carboplatin+ 5-FU, or carboplatin+ docetaxel) | Randomized, Phase III | n = 403 | Median overall survival 12.6 months with bevacizumab and 11 months without bevacizumab (p = 0.13) | Argiris, 2019 [26] |
Chemoradiotherapy | ||||
 RT + docetaxel + bevacizumab | Single arm, Phase II | n = 30 | 3-year PFS 62% | Yao, 2015 [27] |
 RT + cisplatin + bevacizumab | Single arm, Phase II | n = 42 | 2-year PFS 76% | Fury, 2012 [28] |
 RT + 5-FU, hydroxyurea + bevacizumab | Randomized, Phase II | n = 26 | 2-year OS 58% with bevacizumab and 89% without bevacizumab | Salama, 2011 [29] |
EGFR inhibitor | ||||
 Cetuximab + bevacizumab | Single arm, Phase II | n = 46 | RR 16% | Argiris, 2013 [30] |
 Erlotinib + bevacizumab | Single arm, Phase I/II | Phase I n = 10 Phase II n = 48 | Median PFS 4.1 months | Cohen, 2009 [31] |
Chemoradiotherapy + EGFR inhibitor | ||||
 RT + pemetrexed+ cetuximab +/− bevacizumab | Randomized, Phase II | n = 78 | 2-year PFS 75% with bevacizumab and 79% without bevacizumab | Argiris, 2016 [32] |
 RT + cisplatin+ cetuximab + bevacizumab | Single arm, Phase II | n = 30 | 2-year PFS 88.5% | Fury, 2016 [33] |
 Paclitaxel+ carboplatin+ 5-FU + bevacizumab, followed by RT + paclitaxel + erlotinib + bevacizumab | Single arm, Phase II | n = 60 | 3-year PFS 71% | Hainsworth, 2011 [34] |