Skip to main content

Table 1 Studies with cytotoxic chemotherapy alone or in combination with biologic agents

From: Systemic therapy for recurrent or metastatic salivary gland malignancies

Author (year)

Regimen

No of patients

Histology

Progression required

ORR

CBR

Median OS (months)

Airoldi et al. [6]

Vino vs Cis + Vino

20 vs 16

Ad (9), ACC (22), MEC (1), others (4)

Yes

20 % vs 44 %

65 % vs 81 %

8.5 vs 10

Gedlicka et al. [7]

Mitoxantrone + Cis

14

NR

No

14 %

79 %

27

Gilbert et al. [11]

Paclitaxel

45

Ad (17), ACC (14), MEC (14)

No

18 %

51 %

12.5

van Herpen et al.[12]

Gemcitabine

21

ACC (21)

No

0 %

52 %

NR

Ross et al. [10]

Epirubicin + Plat + 5FU

8

ACC (8)

No

12 %

75 %

27

Laurie et al. [8]

Plat + Gemcitabine

33

Ad (8), ACC (10), MEC (4), others (11)

Yesa

24 %

82 %

13.8

Ghosal et al. [47]

Cis + Imatinib

28

ACC (28)

No

11 %

79 %

35

Argiris et al. [50]

Bor → Bor + Dox

24

ACC (24)

Yes

0 % and 8 %b

63 % and 58%b

21

Hitre et al. [49]

Cetuximab + Cis + 5FU

12

ACC (12)

No

42 %

92 %

24

Airoldi et al. [9]

Cis + Vino

60

Ad (15), ACC (34)

Yes

23 %

57 %

10c

  1. 5FU 5-florouracil, ACC adenoid cystic carcinoma; Ad adenocarcinoma, Bor bortezomib, Cis cisplatin, Dox Doxorubicin, MEC mucoepidermoid carcinoma, Plat platinum, Vino vinorelbine, NR not reported
  2. anot required for adenoid cystic carcinoma
  3. bresponse rates for Bor and Bor + Dox combination respectively
  4. cmedian survival for first-line patients only